The PHARMA series shrink bundlers are compact, intermittent motion shrink wrappers designed to collate and shrink wrap pharmaceutical products. This Polypack model uses a motorized pusher to provide smooth, positive transfers. This pharmaceutical shrink wrapper is capable of handling both rounded and squared containers, such as vitamin bottles and small cartons. These compact bundlers are ideal for nutraceutical, pharmaceutical, and personal care products.
Polypack’s FH series shrink wrap machines are intermittent motion total closure shrink wrappers that use a forming head to multipack a variety of products. The shrink wrap bundles are sealed on all sides for increased product protection. Total Closure shrink wrap multipacks are much more resistant to mishandling and warehouse conditions, and they present a nice, continous surface for retail packaging applications.
Polypack’s TR series tray loading-forming machines are extremely versatile, easy to operate, and highly reliable. Polypack offers these tray loading machines in both intermittent motion and continuous motion models running at speeds up to 50 trays per minute. Products are stabilized and controlled throughout the entire process. Adjustments for different product and tray sizes are made quickly and easily. The TR series tray forming machines can be integrated with a Polypack shrink wrapper to provide a turnkey solution for, distribution-ready packaging.
Th WR series machines are Polypack’s high speed continuous motion and intermittend motion wraparound case packers. With corrugated wraparound packaging, a sheet of cardboard is die-cut and folded. For a traditional RSC the flaps, overlapping each other, are located at the sides, and the case is generally filled from the side. Wraparound packaging machines significantly reduce the amount of corrugate overlaps while still providing a strong case that delivers superb strength for palletizing and distribution. By eliminating redundant overlaps, the wraparound case delivers a huge amount of savings on materials when compared to a traditional RSC.
